Hutchins v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SNYDER, Judge.
Movant appeals from a trial court judgment denying his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
Movant asserts that his guilty plea was involuntary because he relied on and was misled by his attorney’s promise “to get him a time reduction.” Movant’s appeal is limited to whether the allegation of a promise of a “time reduction,” in this fact situation, requires an evidentiary hearing to determine the truth of the allegation. The point is ruled against appellant and the judgment affirmed.
On June 3, 1980, movant, pursuant to a plea bargain, pleaded guilty to a charge of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Keller v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Bryant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ray v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Irvin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Litton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Maxey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.