Legal Opinion

Enterprise Manuf'g Co. v. Deisler

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bills in equity by the Enterprise Manufacturing Company v. Deisler, manufacturer, and John Wanamaker, seller, of a meat-cutting device, to enjoin the infringement of patent No. 271,398.

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The suits are for infringement of claims 1 and 2 ofletters patent No. 271,398, issued to John G. Baker, January 30, 1883, for ‘Improvements in mechanism to cut up plastic or yielding substances.” ■Th”» facts in each are the same; and they are, therefore, considered to*855gether. The defense, as set up in the answer, is twofold: First, that the patent is invalid; and, second, that it is not infringed. The first was involved and fully considered, in a suit by this plaintiff against Sargeant & Co., by the circuit court for Connecticut, in 1888, and the patent sustained. The question was examined and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sawyer Spindle Co. v. TaylorU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1895
  2. Gormley & Jeffery Tire Co. v. United States AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API