Legal Opinion

In re Farrell

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 15, 1939No. 37173PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

The bankrupt seeks to set aside the order of the referee denying his application for discharge.

The specification of objection which was sustained by the referee is .as follows:. “On or about the 3rd day of June, 1937, the bankrupt for the purpose of obtaining money upon credit from The Amalgamated Bank of New York made a statement, in writing, which was materially false in that the said written statement did not set forth that the bankrupt was a borrower on a loan at the Morris Plan Industrial Bank of New York at said time. That by virtue of the said written statement,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  2. In Re MonschDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1937
  3. In re LesslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. In re HolzmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re BebarDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970
  2. Rutland Savings Bank v. Norton (In Re Norton)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1980
  3. In re StineDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945
  4. In Re BerkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API