Legal Opinion

Ganson v. Vaughn

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1999No. Trial No. 97CV-22579. Appeal No. C-980929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Ellen Ganson, appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding in favor of defendant-appellee, Kimberly Vaughn, on Ganson’s claims of breach of contract and violations of Ohio’s Uniform Commercial Code and Consumer Sales Practices Act, R.C. Chapter 1345. The case was tried before a magistrate, who found in favor of Vaughn, and the trial court adopted the findings of the magistrate over Ganson’s objections.

Ganson contracted to buy from Vaughn two cranial prostheses, which are replacement hairpieces similar to wigs. Ganson had been diagnosed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Einhorn v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Crull v. Maple Park Body ShopOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Foods v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Renner v. Procter & Gamble Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Estep v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charvat v. Farmers Insurance Columbus, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Williams v. Sharon Woods Collision Center, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Charvat v. DFS SERVICES LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API