Rekun v. Pelaez
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
KLEIN, J.:
¶ 1 Tiffany Rekun, the Administratrix of the Estate of Neil Rekun, initially filed suit against Carl Pelaez after Neil Rekun was killed while riding a motorcycle when hit by Pelaez. Ultimately, the parties agreed to binding arbitration before former Court of Common Pleas Judge Thomas Raup. Judge Raup found Neil Rekun 60% negligent and Carl Pelaez 40% negligent and determined the damages to be $800,000. The parties agreed on a cap on damages of $100,000.
¶ 2 Pelaez filed a motion to confirm the arbitrator’s award because under Pennsylvania’s Comparative Negligence Act, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Hughes v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Midomo Co. v. Presbyterian Housing Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Raiken v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Alexander Andrew, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Scranton Times v. Entercom Wilkes-Barre Scranton LLC, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2011