Legal Opinion

Rekun v. Pelaez

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 2009No. 2321 EDA 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 Tiffany Rekun, the Administratrix of the Estate of Neil Rekun, initially filed suit against Carl Pelaez after Neil Rekun was killed while riding a motorcycle when hit by Pelaez. Ultimately, the parties agreed to binding arbitration before former Court of Common Pleas Judge Thomas Raup. Judge Raup found Neil Rekun 60% negligent and Carl Pelaez 40% negligent and determined the damages to be $800,000. The parties agreed on a cap on damages of $100,000.

¶ 2 Pelaez filed a motion to confirm the arbitrator’s award because under Pennsylvania’s Comparative Negligence Act, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Hughes v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Midomo Co. v. Presbyterian Housing Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Raiken v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Alexander Andrew, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Scranton Times v. Entercom Wilkes-Barre Scranton LLC, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API