Petteway v. South Carolina Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
The only question before us being whether plaintiff’s claim to the benefit of defendants’ uninsured motorist coverages is legally enforceable under G.S. 20-279.21(b)(3) and the record showing without contradiction that plaintiff’s injuries did not result from a collision between motor vehicles, the order is correct and we affirm it.
In personal injury cases based upon the negligence of an unidentified motorist, G.S. 20-279.21(b)(3) authorizes recovery under the uninsured motorist provision of automobile liability insurance policies written in this state only if the injuries…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hendricks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- McNeil v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- East v. Reserve Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by7 opinions
- Andersen v. BaccusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Andersen v. BaccusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Geico Insurance Co. v. LarsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Johnson v. North Carolina Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Moore v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.