Legal Opinion

Mauldin v. United States

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided April 10, 1979No. LR-77-C-101Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARNOLD, District Judge.

This is an estate-tax case. The facts are not in dispute. Oseo Evans died intestate, leaving a widow and two daughters. Under the statutes of Arkansas, the widow was entitled to dower and homestead in real estate left by the decedent. Under Ark. Stats. § 62-701, it was the duty of the daughters, as heirs at law, to “lay off and assign such dower as soon as practicable . .” Failing such an assignment, the widow had a right to go to court (either Chancery or Probate) to have dower allotted. The court has power to divide the lands in some suitable fashion, to order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Traders National Bank of Kansas City, of the Estate of James Oliver Miller, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  2. Bradham v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API