Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cleveland v. Delaware Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 19, 1950Published

1DissentTerry, Judge

(dissenting) : The pertinent provisions of the will and codicil, together with the contentions of the respective parties, appear in the majority opinion of this court and in the opinion of the Vice Chancellor below. 30 Del. Ch. 339, 61 A. 2d 126.

It is with extreme reluctance that I disagree with my associates, but I find it very dangerous for courts, in order not to declare a partial or total intestacy, to supply necessary provisions in order to accommodate their interpretation of testamentary intention. I cannot escape the conclusion in the present case that a partial intestacy took place…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Delaware Trust Co. v. ClevelandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API