Legal Opinion

Bruce Shade v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 27, 2016No. 4D13-516Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

2Per curiam

After he was convicted of burglary of a dwelling and theft, Bruce Shade took an appeal. While the appeal was pending, he moved to correct a sentencing error, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). He argued that a remand is required for the trial court to strike a special condition of probation which was included in the order of probation although not orally pronounced.

Shade does not challenge his convictions. However, based on the state’s concession of error on the sentencing issue, we remand to the trial court to strike from the order of probation…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Kenneth Isaac Parkerson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Fruggiero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API