Cook v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentKelley, Judge
I respectfully dissent. I believe that Claimant is entitled to appeal nunc pro tunc to the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review.1
An historical review surrounding the allowance of appeals nunc pro tune reveals that originally the standard permitting such appeals was one limited to “delays resulting from extraordinary circumstances involving fraud or some breakdown in the court’s operations.” Nixon v. Nixon, 329 Pa. 256,198 A. 154 (1938).
This well settled standard was expanded, however, by our Supreme Court’s decision in Bass v. Commonwealth, 485 Pa. 256, 401 A.2d 1133 (1979), a detañed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Guat Gnoh Ho v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Roderick v. Commonwealth, State Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Finney v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.