Legal Opinion

Garland v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 18, 1961No. App. No. 43PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

The petitioner requests leave to appeal under the P. C. P. A. He was convicted on February 2, 1959, of attempted robbery in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, and, on February 4, 1959, he filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied on March 9, following. He was represented by counsel at his trial and on the hearing of his motion for a new trial.

He raises three questions: (1) that the delay in hearing his motion for a new trial was a violation of Code (1957), Article 27, Section 594, which requires motions for a new trial to be heard within ten (10) days, and thus he was deprived of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snyder v. CearfossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Bruette v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Price v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Farmer v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Downes v. DownesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Downes v. DownesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API