Legal Opinion

Sanders v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1917No. 4767PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The Assistant Attorney General moves to dismiss the appeal because of the insufficiency of the recognizance in that it is not in compliance with article 903, Code of Criminal Procedure. First, it fails to provide that defendant shall abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals; second, it fails to stipulate the obligation shall be joint and several in its liabilities of the sureties, and, third, it fails to show appellant was convicted of a felony. We find from an inspection of the recognizance that it does not comply with article 903, Code of Criminal…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Staten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Reasoner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API