Legal Opinion

Abraham v. Oregon & California R. R.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Douglas : J. W. Hamilton, Judge. Suit by Sol Abraham against the Oregon & California Bailroad Co. and others to enjoin maintenance of a hotel and diversion of water, and for damages.

Read the full summary

From Douglas : J. W. Hamilton, Judge. Suit by Sol Abraham against the Oregon & California Bailroad Co. and others to enjoin maintenance of a hotel and diversion of water, and for damages. The first cause of suit, in substance, is that on the twenty-eighth of February, 1888, the plaintiff and W. B. Willis conveyed to the defendant, the Oregon & California Bailroad Co., certain premises described in the complaint, by an ordinary warranty deed, the habendum clause of which is as follows : “To have and to hold the same, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging, to the said…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is not a suit to correct or reform a deed, and hence there are but two questions for decision on this appeal — first, whether, under the allegation that, at the time the deed was made by the plaintiff and Willis to the Oregon & California Railroad Co., it was understood and agreed that the words “for all legitimate railroad, depot, and warehouse purposes” should not mean or include a hotel or eating house, plaintiff is entitled to an injunction restraining the defendants from maintaining a hotel on the premises conveyed, because in violation of the terms of the grant; and, second, if…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Missisquoi R. R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1887
  2. Moran v. PratherSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. RichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hurst v. Lake Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Tallmadge v. HooperOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Tacoma Mill Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Louisville Property Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API