Legal Opinion

Godshalk v. Richardson

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided January 9, 1922No. 158Published

Motion for judgment n. o. v. C. P. Montgomery Co., June T., 1920, No. 158.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.,

The plaintiff, who is a carpenter, and the defendant, who is a real estate broker, had for a long time had business relations, and, prior to July 15, 1919, the former rendered to the latter a bill for work and labor done, amounting to a total of $243.05. It was agreed at the trial that the amount of this bill was correct, that the work had been done, and that the prices charged for it were proper. Standing alone, it was a presently due and unpaid, liquidated and undisputed claim.

It seems, however, that the defendant claimed, but plaintiff denied, that the latter was at the time…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washington N. Gas Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Tanner v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Dillon's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Bernstein v. HirschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Barry v. CaplinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API