Legal Opinion

Karwicki v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1932No. 3236PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted in the court below of the possession of intoxicating liquors in violation of the National Prohibition Act (title 2, § 25 [27 USCA § 39]). The only evidence supporting the conviction was the testimony of prohibition agents as to finding intoxicating liquors in the course of a search made of appellant’s premises. The government concedes that this search was made by them without a search warrant, but contends that it was consented to by appellant. The only question of importance presented by the appeal, therefore, is as to whether the consent relied upon was sufficient.

On…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. Judd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. Ruth SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Paul W. Gatlin v. United States of America, Dennis O. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  4. Nelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  5. The PEOPLE v. HaskellIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API