Mount v. Bradford
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
THE original action against Larned was commenced by capias returnable to June term, 1838. The sheriff made return “ cepi corpus and bail bondSamuel F. Bradford in due time became special bail.
Read the full summary
THE original action against Larned was commenced by capias returnable to June term, 1838. The sheriff made return “ cepi corpus and bail bondSamuel F. Bradford in due time became special bail. On the 2d July, 1836, the plaintiff obtained a judgment; he subsequently issued writs offieri facias and capias ad satisfacien-dum to the September return day of September term, 1838; the fieri facias was returned “ nulla bona,” and the capias ad satis-faciendum “ N. E. I.” A scire facias on the recognizance of special bail was issued to the October return day of September term, 1836. On the 3d day of…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pettit, President.—
The rule of reciprocity by which the same regard is paid to the insolvent laws of our sister states, which then-courts pay to ours, was stated, for the first time, in Smith v. Brown, 3 Binn. 203; and though Millar v. Hall, 1 Dali. 228, was there cited as furnishing the date of the doctrine, yet it is difficult to find in the report of that case any foundation for the reference. In Boggs v. Treacle, 5 Binn. 339, the rule was repeated upon the authority of Smith v. Brown. In Walsh v. Nourse, 5 Binn. 385, Chief Justice Tilghman…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Boyle v. Zacharie & TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Boggs v. TeackleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1812
- Green v. SarmientoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1810
- Sicard v. WhaleNew York Supreme Court · 1814
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.