Legal Opinion
Guindon v. Pritzker
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 3, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2015-2256PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART
BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
■This case represents the latest chapter in the management of the red snapper fishery in the Gulf of Mexico. Plaintiffs, commercial' fishermen and their affiliated business entities and trade associations, bring this action against Defendants United States Secretary of Commerce, (“Secretary”), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, (“NOAA”), and the National Marine Fisheries Service, (“NMFS”). -…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Nevada v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc. v. RaimondoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc. v. RaimondoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Fishing Rights Alliance, Inc. v. PritzkerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- United Cook Inlet Drift Association v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022