Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Petersen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1917No. 18896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Opinion on motion for rehearing of case reported in 100 Neb. 255.

1Opinion of the CourtCornisi-i, J.

This action was begun by the heirs of Lena Petersen, first wife of Soren T. Petersen, deceased, and who "died in 1875 without issue, to enforce a trust in the property in controversy, because it was purchased with the proceeds of a converted draft, Lena Petersen’s share in a legacy. The defendants are the children of the deceased and his second wife, Maren, now Mrs. Hansen. Defendants contend that the beneficiaries of the trust cannot follow the property, even though so purchased, because it had been *505conveyed by Petersen to Ms second wife (their mother) in 1876 in consideration of marriage,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ryder v. RyderIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Scheps v. Bowery Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Sloan v. CoburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  4. J. P. Leininger Lumber Co. v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. McClatchey v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vielehr v. MaloneNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Colbert v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Milligan v. MilliganNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Perry v. ErdeltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Consolidated Rendering Co. v. MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API