Day v. New York Elevated Railroad
The Superior Court of New York City
Appeal from judgment directed in favor of plaintiff by trial judge at equity term.
1Opinion of the CourtMoAdam, J.
The judgment restrains the defendants from maintaining their elevated railway structure in front of No. 1,009 Third Avenue, until February 1, 1894, unless they pay the plaintiff $1,250, etc. The claim for past damages was waived, and the plaintiff was allowed the value to the end» of the first term of the plaintiff’s .lease (February 1, 1894) of so much of plaintiff’s easements of light, air and access to said premises as have been taken by the defendants, such value being computed from the commencement of the action. The plaintiff is the owner of the building, and the lease contains…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Storms v. . Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Storms v. Manhattan Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902