Legal Opinion
DeArment v. Rax Restaurants, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 27, 1991No. C-2-90-523Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOLSCHUH, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Rax Restaurants, Inc. (“Rax”) to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the grounds that this action has become moot. Plaintiff Roderick A. DeArment, Acting Secretary of Labor, Successor to Elizabeth Hanford Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor (“Secretary”) filed a response in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss and defendant Rax filed a reply.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Thi…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- James H. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRATTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Fred S. Almy, and D.E. Stolberg, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Richard M. Ragsdale v. Bernard J. Turnock, Director of the Illinois Department of Public HealthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.