Eddy Hotel Co. v. Ford
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Garland Circuit Court; William H. Evans, Judge; 1. It was error to sustain the lien on separate buildings on different lots for separate work, when the lien filed shows a running account and a balance due, and was a lien on all the buildings. 63 Ark. 369. 2. It was error to permit the verdict to stand when it is clearly shown that plaintiff failed to comply with his contract in furnishing satisfactory heating plant. 1. Case of 63 Ark. 369, has no application —…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Garland Circuit Court; William H. Evans, Judge; 1. It was error to sustain the lien on separate buildings on different lots for separate work, when the lien filed shows a running account and a balance due, and was a lien on all the buildings. 63 Ark. 369. 2. It was error to permit the verdict to stand when it is clearly shown that plaintiff failed to comply with his contract in furnishing satisfactory heating plant. 1. Case of 63 Ark. 369, has no application — the facts are different. 2. The heating plant’s defects or faults and the credit therefor were questions of fact for the…
1Opinion of the CourtBattdr, J.
The appellant moved for a new trial on three grounds:
“First. Because the verdict was not according to law.
“Second. Because the verdict was not according to the evidence.
“Third. Because the verdict was contrary to the law and evidence.”
It is evident that the determination of the questions presented to us for decision depends upon the evidence adduced in the trial of this cause. With no aid or information except that furnished by the abstract of appellant we are unable to do so, the abstract containing a very small portion of the evidence.
Judgment is affirmed on account of the non-compliance…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Norden v. DevoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Queen of Arkansas Insurance v. Public School District No. 44Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- American Railway Express Co. v. HammockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Diggs v. DiggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Poinsett Gin Company v. McCoySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943