Legal Opinion

Cox v. Clay

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 11, 1950No. 6100Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

PER -CURIAM.

Appellees have filed a motion for rehearing in which they contend that we erred in holding that appellant’s cause of action was not barred by the four-year statute of limitations, Art. 5529, R.C.S., because the deed executed by Mrs. M. J. Cox, appellant’s mother, on January 30, 1919, conveying her undivided one-half interest in the land to¿ appellant was immediately filed in the officelj of the county clerk of Henderson Countyll and recorded in the deed records. They! contend that the record of the deed was open to appellant for inspection, disclosed the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. McGregorTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Leonard v. Benfford Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Herd v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Williams v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Fidelity Lumber Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API