Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1961No. 30,056PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.

The appellant was charged, and after trial convicted of burglary in the second degree. The charge alleged that on the 9th day of February, 1960, he broke into an office and an automobile salesroom of one Paul Price and took, among other things, a red tool box, timing light and a Firestone tire.

The assigned error under the motion for a new trial is that the finding and decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence. Under this assignment it is urged that the corpus delicti was not proved by independent evidence aside from the confession.

This necessitates a brief review of the testimony: At…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Parker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Schuble v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Griffiths v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Gaines v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Grey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pawloski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Weaver v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hayden v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Green v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API