Clyne v. Benicia Water Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
Action to enforce specific performance of an agreement.
The judgment was for plaintiff, and this appeal is upon the judgment-roll.
The findings show that July 5,1883, Eliza D. Nichols was the owner of a tract of land in Solano count), bordering a natural watercourse known as “ Paddy Ranch creek.” She and her grantors had for ten years used the water of said creek for domestic purposes, and for irrigating about four acres of land, part of said tract.
That July 5, 1883, said Nichols executed a mortgage whereby she .mortgaged said land to one Boynton to secure a loan to her of seven…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Farmer v. Ukiah Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frank v. HicksWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
- Russ Lumber & Mill Co. v. Muscupiabe Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Josslyn v. DalyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. McArthurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.