Legal Opinion

Gregory-Conder Mule Co. v. Roddey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 24, 1913No. 8615PublishedCited by 1 opinion

■ Before Spain, J., Columbia, February, 1913. Action by the Gregory-Conder Mule Company against J. B. Roddey. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: 'Case should have been submitted to jury: 68 S. C. 466; 78 S. C. 58; 40 S. C. 466. Issue as to payment: 77 S. E. 733. Novation: 39 Cyc. 1130.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This.is an action on account for a set of furniture sold to Mr. Roddey b)r Mr. H. A. Taylor. The plaintiff claimed that the account was assigned to it, and that no part thereof had been paid. The defendant, Roddey, claimed that the account had been paid by certain commissions, to which he was entitled on a sale of an automobile by the plaintiff to Taylor. The presiding Judge directed a verdict for the plaintiff, from which defendant appealed.

There was much conflict of testimony as to whether the account was assigned or not and as to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wingo v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API