Legal Opinion

HYNES FAMILY TRUST v. Spitz

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 21, 2009No. 4594PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.

The Hynes Family Trust and Richard W. Hynes (Hynes) allege the trial court erred in finding there was no express easement or easement by prior use permitting Hynes' to maintain a storm water drainage pipe across Heide Spitz’s (Spitz) property. We affirm in result.

FACTS

Hynes and Spitz own adjoining townhomes in the Daybreak community in Tega Cay, South Carolina. The town homes share a common wall and are part of a single building containing three units. Hynes’s town home is the middle unit, and the Spitz’s town home is an end unit. Each unit is situated on a separately owned lot which extends…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Queen's Grant II Horizontal Property Regime v. Greenwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Boyd v. BellSouth Telephone Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Slear v. HannaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Hardaway Concrete Co. v. Hall Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Gilbert v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kinard v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API