Legal Opinion
Rynerson v. City of Franklin
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1996No. 41S05-9603-CV-00209PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
SULLIVAN, Justice.
We hold that the procedure in Ind. Code § 86-8-8-4, which permits a city attorney who is a member of a city public works and safety board to prosecute police and fire discipline cases before the board so long as the attorney does not participate as a board member in any police or fire disciplinary proceedings, does not violate due process.
Background
Petitioner Larry J. Rynerson was a police officer with the City of Franklin Police Department. Pursuant to Indiana Code § 36-8-3-4 (1988 & 1989 Supp.), the City of Franklin Board of Public Works and Safety…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Clark v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1998
- City of Hobart Common Council v. Behavioral Institute of Indiana, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Perry-Worth Concerned Citizens v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Foor v. Town of HebronIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Breitweiser v. Indiana Office of Environmental AdjudicationIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.