Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. Westinghouse X-Ray Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdel, J.

This action is by a surgeon to recover damages for injuries to his fingers, the 'result of burns sustained while he was performing operations on patients under the beam projected by an X-ray machine manufactured by the defendant. Plaintiff has recovered a substantial verdict. _

The plaintiff, an experienced surgeon, on two occasions performed operations on patients (the setting of fractures) under the beam of X-rays projected by a machine manufactured by the defendant. At the times in question the machine was being used for fluoroscopy, which is a technique whereby, for the purposes here…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company, a Foreign Corporation v. Thomas W. Howell and Dorothy Howell, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  3. People v. RiveraNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API