Legal Opinion

State v. Hinkle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1954No. 39,361PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, C. J.:

The appellant, Edna Mae Hinkle, alias Edna Mae Spratt, was duly charged by an information filed in the district court of Marshall county with second degree forgery in ten counts, each count charging a separate offense. Upon a jury trial she was found guilty on seven counts and not guilty on three counts. Her motion for a new trial was considered and overruled and she was duly sentenced to imprisonment at the State Industrial Farm for Women at Lansing, Kan.

The checks described in the counts upon which conviction was had, with their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. State v. BackstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. State v. SacksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. HazenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. People v. EppsNew York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API