Thomas v. F. & R. Lazarus & Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING.
No. 3132.
BY THE COURT:
Submitted on application of appellee for rehearing. The brief of appellee suggests the application of the two-issue rule to the verdict and judgment, urges that the evidence on behalf of the plaintiff was sufficient' to require that the question be presented to the jury as to the ratification by appellant of the acts of its agents upon which express malice could be predicated, and finally that if the court was right in its construction of the law of Ohio as to punitive damages, it went too far in this case in holding that as a matter of law…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kolp v. Stevens, PartnersOhio Court of Appeals · 1933