Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gitelson v. Quinn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 2014Published

1Dissent

Tom, J.E,

dissents in a memorandum as follows: I respectfully disagree with the majority and conclude that the oral agreement between the parties was not enforceable under the circumstances of this case.

The parties, who are sisters, assert an interest in real property comprising the substantial portion of the estate of their deceased brother, Joseph Dinko. Their dispute arises out of decedent’s execution of two wills. The first, made in 1990, left a certain parcel of real property located in the County of Queens to plaintiff, defendant and a nephew in equal shares, with the rest of his estate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Dondi v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Da Silva v. MussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. White Light Productions, Inc. v. On The Scene Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Broadwall America, Inc. v. Bram Will-El LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API