Legal Opinion

In re Stonebridge

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a warrant issued on the application of George N. Stonebridge, Jr., receiver of the New York Book ..Company, for the examination of John B. Alden in relation to the company’s property. For former report, see 6 N. Y. Supp. 311.

1Opinion of the CourtBartlett, J.

The warrant against the appellant was issued at the instance of George H. Stonebridge, Jr., receiver of the New York Book Company, assuming to act under certain provisions of the Revised Statutes relating to trustees of insolvent debtors, which provisions are bylaw made applicable to receivers of corporations. 4 Rev. St. (Banks’ 8th Ed.) pp. 2524-2534, and p. 2682, § 72. No notice of the application for the warrant was given to the attorney general. This is the first point made in the-brief of the appellant, and it is fatal. The precise question has been determined by the court of appeals in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Langdon v. New York Book Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1891
  2. Langdon v. New York Book Co.The Superior Court of New York City · 1891
  3. Stiefel v. New York Novelty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API