Legal Opinion

National Fire Insurance v. Shuman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1932No. 21624PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. The provisions of the act of 1916 (Ga. L. 1916, p. 128) authorizing a court of record, under certain conditions, to appoint an umpire to act with-appraisers to ascertain the loss or damage under an insurance policy, are applicable only when the appraisers, one selected by the company and the other selected by the insured, shall have failed or neglected, for a space of ten, days after both have been chosen, to agree upon and select an umpire. The mere failure of the insurance company to select an appraiser does not warrant the appointment of an umpire to act solely with the appraiser…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aetna Cas. & Sur. v. Ins. Comm'rCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Standard Fire Insurance Company v. FraimanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Yates v. Cotton States Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. PACIFIC NATIONAL FIRE &C. CO. v. BeaversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API