CHE Consulting, Inc. v. United States

ORDER

LOREN A. SMITH, Senior Judge.

In this bid protest case, Storage Technology Corporation (“StorageTek”) seeks to intervene as a matter of right pursuant to RCFC 24(a)(2). In the alternative, Storage-Tek moves for leave to intervene permissively pursuant to RCFC 24(b)(2). Plaintiff opposes this motion for two reasons: (1) StorageTek’s interest is strictly economic, and (2) StorageTek’s interest is not sufficiently direct and immediate.1 After oral argument and careful consideration, the Court hereby GRANTS StorageTek’s Motion to Intervene pursuant to RCFC 24(b)(2). The decision is grounded…