Brookhouse v. Koos
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
Our obligation here is to determine whether the trial court’s findings are contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.
In the main, the appellants contend that the record indicates that Mary A. Koos has not administered her fiduciary duties toward the beneficiaries of the trust in a manner commensurate with the degree of loyalty required by law; that the sale of the shares of stock to Grace A. Koos is invalid ; that Máry A. Koos must be removed or not appointed as trustee; and that some other person be appointed as trustee who shall control the sales of the shares of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of WellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Teasdale v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Klitzke v. HermWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Harvey v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brian French v. Wachovia BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Estate of KoosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955