Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Ins. v. Stroehmann

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1935No. 973Published

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

By bill in equity filed the plaintiff, the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, prayed’ for a rescission and cancellation of the disability benefit provisions in policies of insurance issued to Carl F. Stroehmann, one of the defendants. The defendants moved to dismiss the original bill of complaint, which motion was refused in an opinion by this court filed May 17, 1934 (6 F.Supp. 953), in which the court held that the incontestability clauses in the policies did not apply to disability benefits; that the disability clauses were exempt from the incontestability…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ness v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  3. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. StroehmannDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API