Legal Opinion

STATE EX REL. TART v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 4, 2009No. 2007-KP-2451Published

1Per curiam

| xWrit granted; case remanded to the district court. Pursuant to O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 119 S.Ct. 1728, 144 L.Ed.2d 1 (1999), when a state provides a two-tier system of review, the petitioner must seek relief at both levels of review to satisfy exhaustion requirements for federal habeas corpus proceedings. See also Castille v. Peoples, 489 U.S. 346, 351, 109 S.Ct. 1056, 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 380 (1989) (exhaustion requirement not satisfied by “submission of a new claim to a State’s highest court on discretionary review”). Accordingly, our denial of writs in State ex rel. Tart v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Castille v. PeoplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API