Legal Opinion

Quarles v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1936No. Nos. 18576, 18577Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellants, Jesse Quarles and M. M. Lewallen, file identical motions for rehearing, responding to which we have again examined the record. We are not able to agree with appellant that there is not sufficient evidence to corroborate the accomplice witness Grissom. Grissom’s testimony, if true and properly corroborated, makes out a complete case. The wife of Grissom corroborated him by testifying that she saw these two appellants down at the lot where Grissom said they penned the calves and loaded them preparatory to hauling them to Fort Worth. She also…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Maladin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. English v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API