Legal Opinion

Zenkel v. Oneida County Creameries Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for a new trial on the judge’s minutes.

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

This case involves a claim for damages arising from the sale of alleged unwholesome limburger cheese. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant moved for a new trial on the minutes. “ The general rule established by the weight of authority in the United States *252and England is that accompanying all sales by a retail dealer of articles of food for immediate use there is an implied warranty that the same is fit for human consumption.” Race v. Krum, 222 N. Y. 410, 414, and cases cited. The rule has been applied to ice cream made or prepared on the premises (Race v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Race v. . KrumNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Leahy v. Essex Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Auld v. . Manhattan Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McInnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  2. Lieberman v. Sheffield FarmsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API