Legal Opinion

Langston v. Moseley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 8, 1954No. 5-301PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

Roy Langston, Paul Burns, and Belford Scott were sued to compensate personal injuries sustained by Henry Moseley. The court directed a verdict against Burns and Scott and the jury assessed damages at $3,000. Prom this phase of the controversy there is no appeal. Langston’s negligence was submitted to the fact-finders and a verdict in Moseley’s favor for $3,000 was returned. Prom a judgment on the verdict comes this appeal.

Langston was driving across a street intersection in Osceola and had passed the line used by pedestrians when he realized that the red signal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Pittsburg Reduction Co. v. HortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Arkansas Valley Trust Co. v. McIlroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Gage v. HarveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  5. Martin v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bill C. Harris Construction Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Pittman v. FrazerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. James Curtis Pittman v. Thomas Frazer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API