Legal Opinion

Szybura v. City of Elmira

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

David F. Lee, Jr., J.

Defendant moves, in each of the three actions, for leave ‘ ‘ to amend its answer herein and to serve an amended answer to the complaint of the plaintiff.”

The plaintiff in Action No. 3 moves to amend the ad damnum clause of the complaint by increasing the amount set forth in the original complaint, $150,000, to $500,000.

These actions are personal injury actions arising out of a collision of two municipally owned vehicles, a fire vehicle and a police vehicle, on January 3, 1963 or “just prior to midnight on the 2nd day of January, 1963 ” in the City of Elmira. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Drinkwater v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Geary v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. D'Amico v. ResnikNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Lehr v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Szybura v. City of ElmiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API