Legal Opinion

State v. Bunger

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The defendant is awaiting trial on multiple charges of sexual contact with children. A brassiere belonging to one of the alleged victims was seized from the defendant’s bedroom. On the defendant’s motion, the circuit court suppressed this evidence, finding it both irrelevant and prejudicial. We granted the State’s request for intermediate appeal and now reverse the suppression order. We conclude that this evidence is relevant to the defendant’s purported sexual contact with the child, and its probative value is not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Benjamin JamilCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. United States v. Bernardo Betancourt, Bernardo Sando, Norman Gerwitz, Gene Chekanow, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BowkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. GuthmillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. MoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. LaPlanteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API