Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mayle v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1999No. 1997-0729PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 74.] THE STATE EX REL. MAYLE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Mayle v. Indus. Comm.,

1999-Ohio-348.] Workers’ compensation—Industrial Commission does not abuse its discretion in denying claimant’s application alleging violations of specific safety requirements, when. (No. 97-729—Submitted June 9, 1999—Decided July 7, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD09-1207. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellee Apollon Painting Company, Inc. paints…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Mayle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Quality Tower Serv., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Avalotis Painting Co. v. Indus Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Greco v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API