Legal Opinion

Steffan v. Cheney

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 15, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-3669-OGPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GASCH, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on “Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions and For Stay of All Proceedings in this Case Until Plaintiff Obeys this Court’s Discovery Order.” Defendants filed this motion after plaintiff refused to respond to defendants’ deposition questions concerning whether or not plaintiff had engaged in homosexual acts. Defendants ask that plaintiff’s suit be dismissed under Rule 37(b). In the alternative, they ask that the Court enter an order establishing as a fact that plaintiff has engaged in homosexual acts. For the reasons…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joseph C. Steffan v. Richard Cheney, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  2. Joseph C. Steffan v. William J. Perry, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  3. Joseph C. Steffan v. William J. Perry, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API