Legal Opinion

State v. Fidler

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 24, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictment. The facts are stated in full in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.

The defendant James Thurman has filed a plea in abatement to the indictment in this case, on the ground that the grand jury which found said indictment was not legally selected. The illegality assigned is that two of the jurors, namely, John J. Kenyon and John F. Fry, who were drawn from the town of Richmond, were not selected, from the list of jurors drawn from said town, in the order in which their names appeared on said list as required by statute ; and hence the plea alleges that the indictment is void and should be quashed.

The State has demurred to said plea, first, on the ground of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. State v. CarneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. State v. AnsalemeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  4. Vanhook v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  5. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959
  2. Kirksey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. State v. KieonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API