Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Fisher
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Concurring in the judgmentJustice Eid
{15 I agree with the majority that Fisher's fraud and contractual good faith and fair dealing claims fail, but reach that conclusion on grounds other than those cited by the majority. I therefore concur only in the result it reaches.
{16 The majority concludes that it need not reach the question of whether CASOF bars the extrinsic evidence offered by Fisher to support his claims 1 because the contract at issue here unambiguously adopts a 86 percent default interest rate, and therefore the extrinsic evidence would be barred under general principles of contract interpretation. Maj. op. 111. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amoco Oil Co. v. ErvinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Brody v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Kopeikin v. Merchants Mortgage & Trust Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Buckeye Gas Products Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.