Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided January 26, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Ted E. Mullenix State Representative 140 Riverside Drive Hot Springs, Arkansas 71913

Dear Representative Mullenix:

This is in response to your request for an opinion on several questions relating to property taxes imposed by school districts. You have included with your request a letter from an officer of a citizens' group that states that a specified district's rate of tax includes 10.2 mills for the retirement of existing indebtedness but that, owing to refinancings and increases in property valuations, it is estimated (by the citizens' group) that a rate of less than four mills…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ruff v. WomackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Lewelling v. Mansfield School Dist. No. 76Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. Adams v. Dewitt Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Lakeside School Dist. of Chicot County v. GainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  5. Sims v. Hazen School District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API