Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Andrews
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 30, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.
Habeas Corpus. Petitioner was arrested on a charge that he had violated an ordinance of the city of Springfield, and is now constructively in the custody of the chief of police of that City, where he is held pending a trial. The ordinance he is charged with having violated, so far as pertinent, is as follows:
“Sec. 1. No .person, firm or corporation shall engage in the business of transporting passengers for hire within the Emits of Springfield, Missouri, without first obtaining from said city a license to carry on and engage in said occupation, for which license a charge shall be made as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex Parte AndrewsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ex Parte LockhartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Carter Carburetor Corp. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- St. Louis Public Service Company v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Edmonds v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- City of Poplar Bluff v. Poplar Bluff Loan & Building Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963