Legal Opinion

Riddell v. City of Brinkley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 2, 1981No. 80-268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is a zoning case from the City of Brinkley, Arkansas. The chancellor found valid a city ordinance that rezoned a tract of land on Brinkley’s southwest city limits.

On appeal the appellants argue that the chancellor was wrong because the ordinance was arbitrary, capricious, and amounted to spot zoning. We disagree and affirm the decree.

The tract in question is on the city limits of Brinkley, Arkansas, and is part of a larger tract which was zoned R-l, for residential purposes only, in 1967. At that time the City of Brinkley adopted a comprehensive plan and,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Downs v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  2. City of Little Rock v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Tate v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Worth James v. P. B. Price Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Marling v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. PH, LLC v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Bassett v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1996
  4. Smith v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Smith v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API