Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Serenivision, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 2018No. B277574Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 2/8/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO CLAYTON DOUGLASS, B277574 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC596779) v. SERENIVISION, INC., Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Michael P. Linfield, Judge. Affirmed. Hochfelsen & Kani and Steven I. Hochfelsen for Plaintiff and Appellant. Phillips, Spallas & Angstadt and Michael R. Halvorsen for Defendant and Respondent. ****** There is a “strong presumption that courts should…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. BG Group, PLC v. Republic of ArgentinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API